305 10TH AV, San Francisco

CA › San Francisco County › San FranciscoA0055

In plain words

What this means for a renter at this address on 2026-01-02.

Rent increases

Applies. For rent-controlled units, the annual allowable rent increase effective March 1, 2026 through February 28, 2027 is 1.6% of the tenant's base rent. For example, a $2,000 base rent can increase by $32 to $2,032. (S.F. Admin. Code ch. 37)

A local rule governs instead. Over any 12-month period, a landlord cannot raise rent by more than 5% plus the local cost-of-living change, or 10%, whichever is lower. Rent can be raised at most twice in 12 months for the same tenant, and the landlord may set any starting rent for a new tenancy. (Cal. Civ. Code § 1947.12)

Eviction protection

Applies. A landlord of a unit covered by the Rent Ordinance may evict only for one of 17 listed just causes, and that cause must be the dominant motive. Expiration of a lease or a change in ownership is not just cause. (S.F. Admin. Code ch. 37, § 37.9(a))

A local rule governs instead. After you have lived in your home continuously and lawfully for 12 months, your landlord can end your tenancy only for a listed at-fault or no-fault just cause stated in the written notice. For no-fault terminations the landlord must pay one month's rent as relocation assistance within 15 days of the notice or waive the final month's rent. (Cal. Civ. Code § 1946.2)

Security deposit

Applies. A landlord cannot demand or receive security (deposit, fee or charge) above one month's rent, in addition to first month's rent. Small landlords (natural persons or all-natural-person LLCs owning no more than two properties with four units total) may charge up to two months' rent, but not to service members. (Cal. Civ. Code § 1950.5)

Applies. Landlords must pay interest on tenant security deposits at 4.2% for March 1, 2026 through February 28, 2027. (S.F. Admin. Code ch. 49, § 49.2)

Application fees

Applies. A landlord may charge an application screening fee of no more than $30 per applicant (adjusted for CPI since 1998), and never more than actual out-of-pocket costs and time spent. No fee may be charged if no unit is available or will be soon, and the landlord must give an itemized receipt and follow first-come screening or refund rules. (Cal. Civ. Code § 1950.6)

Tenant screening

Applies. Landlords may not discriminate against applicants or tenants because of their source of income, including Section 8 vouchers and other government subsidies. Where a government rent subsidy applies, income standards must be based on the portion of rent the tenant pays, and applicants with credit history screening must be allowed to offer alternative evidence of ability to pay. Landlords may still ask about the level or source of income. (Cal. Gov. Code § 12955)

Rent-pricing software

Applies. It is unlawful to use or distribute a common pricing algorithm as part of a contract, combination or conspiracy to restrain trade, or to coerce another person to adopt prices or commercial terms recommended by such an algorithm. A common pricing algorithm is software or other methodology used by two or more persons that uses competitor data to recommend or influence a price. (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16729 (added by Stats. 2025, ch. 338, A.B. 325))

Applies. Landlords and others may not sell or use algorithmic devices, such as software that analyzes nonpublic competitor rental data, to set rents or manage occupancy levels for residential units in San Francisco. A tenant or the City Attorney can bring a civil action over violations. (S.F. Rent Ordinance § 37.10C (S.F. Admin. Code ch. 37))

Legal information, not legal advice.

Every rule, with its source

8 apply · 2 superseded by local law

Rent increase limits

Applies

San Francisco Rent Ordinance annual allowable rent increase (3/1/2026–2/28/2027)

S.F. Admin. Code ch. 37 · San Francisco, CA · medium confidence

For rent-controlled units, the annual allowable rent increase effective March 1, 2026 through February 28, 2027 is 1.6% of the tenant's base rent. For example, a $2,000 base rent can increase by $32 to $2,032.

Key value 1.6%

San Francisco, CA city rule; in force. Coverage conditions are met on the supplied facts. Assumes co_date: 1963-01-01–1963-12-31 (presumed) · DataSF wv5m-vpq2 (2025 roll) · bounded from year built 1963 (assumes first CO within 0 year of construction); no CO record.

The announcement sets the annual allowable increase under the San Francisco Rent Ordinance. The prior period (3/1/2025–2/28/2026) was 1.4%.

Show reasoning

JurisdictiontrueLegal statusin_forceCoveragetrue

Exemption: Certificate of Occupancy after June 13, 1979 (all of) → false

falseUnit first obtained a Certificate of Occupancy after June 13, 1979Fact: 1963-01-01–1963-12-31 (presumed) · DataSF wv5m-vpq2 (2025 roll) · bounded from year built 1963 (assumes first CO within 0 year of construction); no CO record

Superseded by local rule

California Tenant Protection Act rent cap (Civ. Code § 1947.12)

Cal. Civ. Code § 1947.12 · CA · medium confidence

Over any 12-month period, a landlord cannot raise rent by more than 5% plus the local cost-of-living change, or 10%, whichever is lower. Rent can be raised at most twice in 12 months for the same tenant, and the landlord may set any starting rent for a new tenancy.

Key value 5% + CPI, max 10%

Statewide CA rule; in force (effective 2024-01-01). Coverage conditions are met on the supplied facts. Assumes affordable_restricted: false (presumed) · DataSF wv5m-vpq2 (2025 roll) · no subsidy/deed restriction recorded in assessor use code; co_date: 1963-01-01–1963-12-31 (presumed) · DataSF wv5m-vpq2 (2025 roll) · bounded from year built 1963 (assumes first CO within 0 year of construction); no CO record. A local rule in the same category governs: r-63566f.

Does not apply to housing under local rent control that restricts annual increases to less than the state cap. The section does not expand or limit local governments' authority to adopt rent controls consistent with Civ. Code § 1954.50 et seq. Effective January 1, 2024 and operative April 1, 2024 (Stats. 2023, ch. 290, SB 567); repealed January 1, 2030.

Show reasoning

Exemptions in the law: Deed-restricted or subsidized affordable housing; dormitories of higher education or K-12 schools; housing under stricter local rent control; housing with a certificate of occupancy issued within the previous 15 years (except mobilehomes); separately alienable property (e.g. single-family homes, condos) whose owner is not a REIT, corporation, LLC with a corporate member or mobilehome park management and where written notice was given; duplex where the owner occupies one unit as principal residence.

JurisdictiontrueLegal statusin_forceCoveragetrue

Exemption: Deed-restricted or subsidized affordable housing (all of) → false

falseHousing restricted as affordable or subsidizedFact: false (presumed) · DataSF wv5m-vpq2 (2025 roll) · no subsidy/deed restriction recorded in assessor use code

Exemption: School dormitories (all of) → false

falseDormitory owned and operated by a higher-education institution or K-12 schoolFact: multifamily · DataSF wv5m-vpq2 (2025 roll) · use code A5 Apartment 5 to 14 Units

Exemption: Certificate of occupancy within previous 15 years (not mobilehome) (all of) → false

falseCertificate of occupancy issued within the previous 15 yearsFact: 1963-01-01–1963-12-31 (presumed) · DataSF wv5m-vpq2 (2025 roll) · bounded from year built 1963 (assumes first CO within 0 year of construction); no CO record
trueNot a mobilehomeFact: multifamily · DataSF wv5m-vpq2 (2025 roll) · use code A5 Apartment 5 to 14 Units

Exemption: Separately alienable property with non-corporate owner and notice (all of) → false

falseResidential property alienable separate from title to any other dwelling unitFact: multifamily · DataSF wv5m-vpq2 (2025 roll) · use code A5 Apartment 5 to 14 Units
unknownOwner is not a REIT or corporationFact: not in data (owner names deliberately excluded from sample)
unknownOwner is not an LLC with a corporate member or mobilehome park managementFact: not in data
unknownTenants were given the required written exemption noticeFact: not in data

Exemption: Owner-occupied duplex (all of) → false

falseProperty with two dwelling units in a single structureFact: multifamily · DataSF wv5m-vpq2 (2025 roll) · use code A5 Apartment 5 to 14 Units
unknownOwner occupies one unit as principal residenceFact: not in data (owner occupancy not in data)

Missing facts that cannot change this answer

Irrelevant here: exemption "Separately alienable property with non-corporate owner and notice" also requires "Residential property alienable separate from title to any other dwelling unit", which is false (multifamily · DataSF wv5m-vpq2 (2025 roll) · use code A5 Apartment 5 to 14 Units); a conjunction with a false part is false whatever "Owner is not a REIT or corporation" is.
Irrelevant here: exemption "Separately alienable property with non-corporate owner and notice" also requires "Residential property alienable separate from title to any other dwelling unit", which is false (multifamily · DataSF wv5m-vpq2 (2025 roll) · use code A5 Apartment 5 to 14 Units); a conjunction with a false part is false whatever "Owner is not an LLC with a corporate member or mobilehome park management" is.
Irrelevant here: exemption "Separately alienable property with non-corporate owner and notice" also requires "Residential property alienable separate from title to any other dwelling unit", which is false (multifamily · DataSF wv5m-vpq2 (2025 roll) · use code A5 Apartment 5 to 14 Units); a conjunction with a false part is false whatever "Tenants were given the required written exemption notice" is.
Irrelevant here: exemption "Owner-occupied duplex" also requires "Property with two dwelling units in a single structure", which is false (multifamily · DataSF wv5m-vpq2 (2025 roll) · use code A5 Apartment 5 to 14 Units); a conjunction with a false part is false whatever "Owner occupies one unit as principal residence" is.

Yields to: r-63566f

Just-cause eviction

Applies

San Francisco Rent Ordinance just cause eviction (Section 37.9(a))

S.F. Admin. Code ch. 37, § 37.9(a) · San Francisco, CA · high confidence

A landlord of a unit covered by the Rent Ordinance may evict only for one of 17 listed just causes, and that cause must be the dominant motive. Expiration of a lease or a change in ownership is not just cause.

Key value 17 enumerated just causes; dominant motive required

San Francisco, CA city rule; in force. Coverage conditions are met on the supplied facts.

Applies even to some tenancies exempt from the Ordinance's rent increase limits, including newer construction and Costa-Hawkins-eligible tenancies.

Show reasoning

JurisdictiontrueLegal statusin_forceCoveragetrue

No property-level conditions extracted: the rule covers all residential rentals in its jurisdiction.

Superseded by local rule

California Tenant Protection Act – Just Cause Eviction

Cal. Civ. Code § 1946.2 · CA · medium confidence

After you have lived in your home continuously and lawfully for 12 months, your landlord can end your tenancy only for a listed at-fault or no-fault just cause stated in the written notice. For no-fault terminations the landlord must pay one month's rent as relocation assistance within 15 days of the notice or waive the final month's rent.

Key value Just cause required after 12 months of occupancy; relocation assistance of 1 month's rent for no-fault termination

Statewide CA rule; in force (effective 2026-01-01). Coverage conditions are met on the supplied facts. Assumes co_date: 1963-01-01–1963-12-31 (presumed) · DataSF wv5m-vpq2 (2025 roll) · bounded from year built 1963 (assumes first CO within 0 year of construction); no CO record; affordable_restricted: false (presumed) · DataSF wv5m-vpq2 (2025 roll) · no subsidy/deed restriction recorded in assessor use code; exemption "Shared facilities with owner" does not apply (not determinable from data). A local rule in the same category governs: r-5a7da0.

Does not apply to property subject to a local just cause ordinance adopted on or before September 1, 2019, or a later local ordinance that is more protective (with a binding finding); the local ordinance applies instead. A property is not subject to both. Less protective local ordinances adopted after September 1, 2019 are not enforced. Amended by AB 1529 (Stats. 2025, ch. 203), effective January 1, 2026; section operative April 1, 2024 and repealed January 1, 2030.

Show reasoning

Exemptions in the law: Transient hotels; nonprofit hospitals, religious facilities, care facilities; school dormitories; shared bathroom/kitchen with owner-occupant; owner-occupied single-family residences renting no more than two units or bedrooms; owner-occupied duplexes; housing with a certificate of occupancy within the previous 15 years (except mobilehomes); separately alienable property whose owner is not a REIT, corporation, or LLC with a corporate member and where the required exemption notice was given; deed-restricted or subsidized affordable housing.

JurisdictiontrueLegal statusin_forceCoveragetrue

Exemption: Transient and tourist hotel occupancy (all of) → false

falseTransient and tourist hotel occupancyFact: multifamily · DataSF wv5m-vpq2 (2025 roll) · use code A5 Apartment 5 to 14 Units

Exemption: Nonprofit hospital, religious facility, extended care or residential care facility (all of) → false

falseHousing in nonprofit hospital, religious facility, extended care or care facilityFact: multifamily · DataSF wv5m-vpq2 (2025 roll) · use code A5 Apartment 5 to 14 Units

Exemption: Institutional dormitories (all of) → false

falseDormitory owned and operated by higher education institution or K-12 schoolFact: multifamily · DataSF wv5m-vpq2 (2025 roll) · use code A5 Apartment 5 to 14 Units

Exemption: Shared facilities with owner (all of) → false

unknownTenant shares bathroom or kitchen with owner who lives on the property as principal residenceFact: not in data

Exemption: Single-family owner-occupied residence (all of) → false

falseSingle-family residenceFact: multifamily · DataSF wv5m-vpq2 (2025 roll) · use code A5 Apartment 5 to 14 Units
unknownOwner-occupiedFact: not in data (owner occupancy not in data)

Exemption: Owner-occupied duplex (all of) → false

falseTwo dwelling units within a single structureFact: multifamily · DataSF wv5m-vpq2 (2025 roll) · use code A5 Apartment 5 to 14 Units
unknownOwner occupied one unit as principal residence at start of tenancy and continuesFact: not in data (owner occupancy not in data)

Exemption: Certificate of occupancy within previous 15 years (all of) → false

falseCertificate of occupancy issued within the previous 15 yearsFact: 1963-01-01–1963-12-31 (presumed) · DataSF wv5m-vpq2 (2025 roll) · bounded from year built 1963 (assumes first CO within 0 year of construction); no CO record
trueExemption does not apply to mobilehomesFact: multifamily · DataSF wv5m-vpq2 (2025 roll) · use code A5 Apartment 5 to 14 Units

Exemption: Separately alienable property with qualifying owner (all of) → false

falseResidential property alienable separate from title to any other dwelling unitFact: multifamily · DataSF wv5m-vpq2 (2025 roll) · use code A5 Apartment 5 to 14 Units
unknownOwner is not a REIT, corporation, or LLC with a corporate memberFact: not in data (owner names deliberately excluded from sample)
unknownTenants were given the required written exemption noticeFact: not in data

Exemption: Deed-restricted or subsidized affordable housing (all of) → false

falseRestricted affordable or subsidized housingFact: false (presumed) · DataSF wv5m-vpq2 (2025 roll) · no subsidy/deed restriction recorded in assessor use code

Missing facts that cannot change this answer

Irrelevant here: exemption "Single-family owner-occupied residence" also requires "Single-family residence", which is false (multifamily · DataSF wv5m-vpq2 (2025 roll) · use code A5 Apartment 5 to 14 Units); a conjunction with a false part is false whatever "Owner-occupied" is.
Irrelevant here: exemption "Owner-occupied duplex" also requires "Two dwelling units within a single structure", which is false (multifamily · DataSF wv5m-vpq2 (2025 roll) · use code A5 Apartment 5 to 14 Units); a conjunction with a false part is false whatever "Owner occupied one unit as principal residence at start of tenancy and continues" is.
Irrelevant here: exemption "Separately alienable property with qualifying owner" also requires "Residential property alienable separate from title to any other dwelling unit", which is false (multifamily · DataSF wv5m-vpq2 (2025 roll) · use code A5 Apartment 5 to 14 Units); a conjunction with a false part is false whatever "Owner is not a REIT, corporation, or LLC with a corporate member" is.
Irrelevant here: exemption "Separately alienable property with qualifying owner" also requires "Residential property alienable separate from title to any other dwelling unit", which is false (multifamily · DataSF wv5m-vpq2 (2025 roll) · use code A5 Apartment 5 to 14 Units); a conjunction with a false part is false whatever "Tenants were given the required written exemption notice" is.

Yields to: r-5a7da0

Security deposits

Applies

California residential security deposit cap

Cal. Civ. Code § 1950.5 · CA · high confidence

A landlord cannot demand or receive security (deposit, fee or charge) above one month's rent, in addition to first month's rent. Small landlords (natural persons or all-natural-person LLCs owning no more than two properties with four units total) may charge up to two months' rent, but not to service members.

Key value 1 month's rent maximum (2 months for small landlords)

Statewide CA rule; in force (effective 2024-07-01). Coverage conditions are met on the supplied facts.

Document shows the section as last amended by Stats. 2025, ch. 340 (AB 414), effective January 1, 2026; the July 1, 2024 date comes from subdivision (c)(6). No local-law interaction is stated.

Show reasoning

Exemptions in the law: Advance payment of six months' rent or more allowed if lease term is six months or longer; mutual agreement for tenant-requested alterations for a specified fee. Small-landlord two-month cap does not apply if the prospective tenant is a service member.

JurisdictiontrueLegal statusin_forceCoveragetrue

No property-level conditions extracted: the rule covers all residential rentals in its jurisdiction.

Applies

San Francisco security deposit interest rate

S.F. Admin. Code ch. 49, § 49.2 · San Francisco, CA · medium confidence

Landlords must pay interest on tenant security deposits at 4.2% for March 1, 2026 through February 28, 2027.

Key value 4.2% interest (March 1, 2026 – February 28, 2027)

San Francisco, CA city rule; in force. Coverage conditions are met on the supplied facts.

Annual rate set by the SF Rent Board; prior rates were 5.0% (2025-26) and 5.2% (2024-25).

Show reasoning

JurisdictiontrueLegal statusin_forceCoveragetrue

No property-level conditions extracted: the rule covers all residential rentals in its jurisdiction.

Application & screening fees

Applies

California application screening fee cap

Cal. Civ. Code § 1950.6 · CA · high confidence

A landlord may charge an application screening fee of no more than $30 per applicant (adjusted for CPI since 1998), and never more than actual out-of-pocket costs and time spent. No fee may be charged if no unit is available or will be soon, and the landlord must give an itemized receipt and follow first-come screening or refund rules.

Key value $30 per applicant, CPI-adjusted since January 1, 1998

Statewide CA rule; in force (effective 2026-01-01). Coverage conditions are met on the supplied facts.

Section 1950.6 applies notwithstanding Civ. Code § 1950.5; the fee is not treated as security or an advance fee. It does not preempt rules on deposits and fees under federal or state housing assistance programs. Effective date is that of the AB 1170 (2025) amendment.

Show reasoning

JurisdictiontrueLegal statusin_forceCoveragetrue

No property-level conditions extracted: the rule covers all residential rentals in its jurisdiction.

Screening restrictions

Applies

California FEHA source-of-income protections in housing (Gov. Code § 12955)

Cal. Gov. Code § 12955 · CA · high confidence

Landlords may not discriminate against applicants or tenants because of their source of income, including Section 8 vouchers and other government subsidies. Where a government rent subsidy applies, income standards must be based on the portion of rent the tenant pays, and applicants with credit history screening must be allowed to offer alternative evidence of ability to pay. Landlords may still ask about the level or source of income.

Key value ban on source-of-income discrimination (incl. housing vouchers)

Statewide CA rule; in force (effective 2024-01-01). Coverage conditions are met on the supplied facts.

Source-of-income language in its current form was amended by SB 267 (Stats. 2023, ch. 776), effective January 1, 2024. The document says nothing about local ordinances.

Show reasoning

JurisdictiontrueLegal statusin_forceCoveragetrue

Exemption: Owner-occupied home renting to one additional person (all of) → false

unknownOwner occupies the homeFact: not in data (owner occupancy not in data)
falseOwner rents to only one additional personFact: multifamily · DataSF wv5m-vpq2 (2025 roll) · use code A5 Apartment 5 to 14 Units

Missing facts that cannot change this answer

Irrelevant here: exemption "Owner-occupied home renting to one additional person" also requires "Owner rents to only one additional person", which is false (multifamily · DataSF wv5m-vpq2 (2025 roll) · use code A5 Apartment 5 to 14 Units); a conjunction with a false part is false whatever "Owner occupies the home" is.

Algorithmic rent-setting

Applies

California AB 325 – Common pricing algorithm prohibition (Cartwright Act)

Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16729 (added by Stats. 2025, ch. 338, A.B. 325) · CA · high confidence

It is unlawful to use or distribute a common pricing algorithm as part of a contract, combination or conspiracy to restrain trade, or to coerce another person to adopt prices or commercial terms recommended by such an algorithm. A common pricing algorithm is software or other methodology used by two or more persons that uses competitor data to recommend or influence a price.

Key value ban on use or distribution of common pricing algorithms in restraint of trade or with coercion

Statewide CA rule; in force (effective 2026-01-01). Coverage conditions are met on the supplied facts.

Chaptered October 6, 2025 with no urgency clause shown, so effective January 1, 2026 under Cal. Const. art. IV, § 8(c). Section 16729(c) preserves other antitrust laws. The document does not address local ordinances.

Show reasoning

JurisdictiontrueLegal statusin_forceCoveragetrue

No property-level conditions extracted: the rule covers all residential rentals in its jurisdiction.

Applies

San Francisco Rent Ordinance § 37.10C – ban on algorithmic rent-setting devices

S.F. Rent Ordinance § 37.10C (S.F. Admin. Code ch. 37) · San Francisco, CA · high confidence

Landlords and others may not sell or use algorithmic devices, such as software that analyzes nonpublic competitor rental data, to set rents or manage occupancy levels for residential units in San Francisco. A tenant or the City Attorney can bring a civil action over violations.

Key value ban on sale or use of algorithmic rent-setting devices

San Francisco, CA city rule; in force (effective 2024-10-14). Coverage conditions are met on the supplied facts.

Show reasoning

JurisdictiontrueLegal statusin_forceCoveragetrue

No property-level conditions extracted: the rule covers all residential rentals in its jurisdiction.

Building facts

Legal city: San Franciscomunicipal-assessor-roll: 305 10TH AV (ev-eba3bd8dd9)
County: San Francisco County
Year built: 1963 · DataSF wv5m-vpq2 (2025 roll)
Units: 6 · DataSF wv5m-vpq2 (2025 roll)
Certificate of occupancy: 1963-01-01–1963-12-31 (presumed) · DataSF wv5m-vpq2 (2025 roll) · bounded from year built 1963 (assumes first CO within 0 year of construction); no CO record
Property type: multifamily · DataSF wv5m-vpq2 (2025 roll) · use code A5 Apartment 5 to 14 Units
Owner type: not in data (owner names deliberately excluded from sample)
Owner-occupied: not in data (owner occupancy not in data)
Owner portfolio: not in data (owner portfolio not in data)
Deed-restricted / subsidized: false (presumed) · DataSF wv5m-vpq2 (2025 roll) · no subsidy/deed restriction recorded in assessor use code
Assessor use: A5 Apartment 5 to 14 Units

Public records consulted

ev-eba3bd8dd9 · municipal-assessor-roll · validated · used
city: "San Francisco"
Exact source span
```
A0055,305 10TH AV,San Francisco,CA,,DataSF wv5m-vpq2 (2025 roll),2026-10-01T22:50Z
```
source · retrieved 2026-10-01T22:50

Audit view source, retrieval date, as-of date and reasoning boundary per answer

Audit trail for each answer
Rule	Result	Source	Retrieved	As of	Reasoning boundary	Confidence
r-2fcd4bCal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16729 (added by Stats. 2025, ch. 338, A.B. 325)	applies	D022	2026-10-01	2026-01-02	decided by supplied facts	high
r-98c475Cal. Civ. Code § 1950.6	applies	D026	2026-10-01	2026-01-02	decided by supplied facts	high
r-b3a720Cal. Civ. Code § 1946.2	superseded	D023	2026-10-01	2026-01-02	decided by supplied factspresumes: co_date: 1963-01-01–1963-12-31 (presumed) · DataSF wv5m-vpq2 (2025 roll) · bounded from year built 1963 (assumes first CO within 0 year of construction); no CO record; affordable_restricted: false (presumed) · DataSF wv5m-vpq2 (2025 roll) · no subsidy/deed restriction recorded in assessor use code; exemption "Shared facilities with owner" does not apply (not determinable from data)	medium
r-f6181cCal. Civ. Code § 1947.12	superseded	D024	2026-10-01	2026-01-02	decided by supplied factspresumes: affordable_restricted: false (presumed) · DataSF wv5m-vpq2 (2025 roll) · no subsidy/deed restriction recorded in assessor use code; co_date: 1963-01-01–1963-12-31 (presumed) · DataSF wv5m-vpq2 (2025 roll) · bounded from year built 1963 (assumes first CO within 0 year of construction); no CO record	medium
r-90b45cCal. Gov. Code § 12955	applies	D027	2026-10-01	2026-01-02	decided by supplied facts	high
r-29e94dCal. Civ. Code § 1950.5	applies	D025	2026-10-01	2026-01-02	decided by supplied facts	high
r-0f1ffeS.F. Rent Ordinance § 37.10C (S.F. Admin. Code ch. 37)	applies	D081	2026-10-01	2026-01-02	decided by supplied facts	high
r-5a7da0S.F. Admin. Code ch. 37, § 37.9(a)	applies	D079	2026-10-01	2026-01-02	decided by supplied facts	high
r-63566fS.F. Admin. Code ch. 37	applies	D080	2026-10-01	2026-01-02	decided by supplied factspresumes: co_date: 1963-01-01–1963-12-31 (presumed) · DataSF wv5m-vpq2 (2025 roll) · bounded from year built 1963 (assumes first CO within 0 year of construction); no CO record	medium
r-ac9b31S.F. Admin. Code ch. 49, § 49.2	applies	D083	2026-10-01	2026-01-02	decided by supplied facts	medium

Download audit trail (JSON) · snapshot snap-eea786560def · official facts only

Legal information, not legal advice. Covers the supplied corpus only (3 states, 10 cities, 6 rule categories); absence of a rule here is not proof that none exists. Results as of 2026-01-02. Snapshot snap-eea786560def.