RuleTwin
All addresses

734 JAMAICA CT, San Diego

CA › San Diego County › San DiegoA0165

In plain words

Ver en español

What this means for a renter at this address on 2026-01-02.

Rent increases

Depends on: first certificate-of-occupancy date. Over any 12-month period, a landlord cannot raise rent by more than 5% plus the local cost-of-living change, or 10%, whichever is lower. Rent can be raised at most twice in 12 months for the same tenant, and the landlord may set any starting rent for a new tenancy. (Cal. Civ. Code § 1947.12)

Eviction protection

Depends on: first certificate-of-occupancy date. After you have lived in your home continuously and lawfully for 12 months, your landlord can end your tenancy only for a listed at-fault or no-fault just cause stated in the written notice. For no-fault terminations the landlord must pay one month's rent as relocation assistance within 15 days of the notice or waive the final month's rent. (Cal. Civ. Code § 1946.2)

Depends on: first certificate-of-occupancy date. A landlord may not terminate a tenancy without just cause (at-fault or no-fault). For no-fault terminations the landlord must give notice, pay relocation assistance of two months' rent (three months if tenant is a senior or disabled) or waive that rent, and offer the unit back in certain cases. (San Diego Municipal Code §§ 98.0701–98.0710)

Security deposit

Applies. A landlord cannot demand or receive security (deposit, fee or charge) above one month's rent, in addition to first month's rent. Small landlords (natural persons or all-natural-person LLCs owning no more than two properties with four units total) may charge up to two months' rent, but not to service members. (Cal. Civ. Code § 1950.5)

Application fees

Applies. A landlord may charge an application screening fee of no more than $30 per applicant (adjusted for CPI since 1998), and never more than actual out-of-pocket costs and time spent. No fee may be charged if no unit is available or will be soon, and the landlord must give an itemized receipt and follow first-come screening or refund rules. (Cal. Civ. Code § 1950.6)

Tenant screening

Applies. Landlords may not discriminate against applicants or tenants because of their source of income, including Section 8 vouchers and other government subsidies. Where a government rent subsidy applies, income standards must be based on the portion of rent the tenant pays, and applicants with credit history screening must be allowed to offer alternative evidence of ability to pay. Landlords may still ask about the level or source of income. (Cal. Gov. Code § 12955)

Rent-pricing software

Applies. It is unlawful to use or distribute a common pricing algorithm as part of a contract, combination or conspiracy to restrain trade, or to coerce another person to adopt prices or commercial terms recommended by such an algorithm. A common pricing algorithm is software or other methodology used by two or more persons that uses competitor data to recommend or influence a price. (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16729 (added by Stats. 2025, ch. 338, A.B. 325))

Applies. Landlords may not use algorithmic software that relies on nonpublic competitor data to set rents or occupancy levels, and no one may sell or license such software to a landlord. Tenants can sue for injunctive relief, damages or civil penalties. (S.D. Mun. Code §§ 98.1101–98.1104 (proposed Div. 11, Ch. 9, Art. 8; O-2025-107))

Legal information, not legal advice.

Every rule, with its source

5 apply · 3 depend on missing facts

Rent increase limits

Depends on first certificate-of-occupancy date

California Tenant Protection Act rent cap (Civ. Code § 1947.12)

Cal. Civ. Code § 1947.12 · CA · low confidence

Over any 12-month period, a landlord cannot raise rent by more than 5% plus the local cost-of-living change, or 10%, whichever is lower. Rent can be raised at most twice in 12 months for the same tenant, and the landlord may set any starting rent for a new tenancy.

Key value 5% + CPI, max 10%

Statewide CA rule; in force (effective 2024-01-01). Coverage depends on facts not in the data: Certificate of occupancy issued within the previous 15 years; Owner is not a REIT or corporation; Owner is not an LLC with a corporate member or mobilehome park management; Tenants were given the required written exemption notice; Owner occupies one unit as principal residence. Assumes affordable_restricted: false (presumed) · SANDAG/SanGIS parcels · no subsidy/deed restriction recorded in assessor use code.

Outcomes (13 admissible cases checked, exhaustive):

Applieswhen (first certificate-of-occupancy date ≤ 2011-01-01)
Does not applywhen (first certificate-of-occupancy date ≥ 2011-01-02)

Next action: Get first certificate-of-occupancy date: City building-department certificate-of-occupancy record (LA: LADBS open data; or a verified record import).

Does not apply to housing under local rent control that restricts annual increases to less than the state cap. The section does not expand or limit local governments' authority to adopt rent controls consistent with Civ. Code § 1954.50 et seq. Effective January 1, 2024 and operative April 1, 2024 (Stats. 2023, ch. 290, SB 567); repealed January 1, 2030.

Source evidence

California Tenant Protection Act rent cap (Civ. Code § 1947.12)

Citation
Cal. Civ. Code § 1947.12
Status
enacted
Effective
2024-01-01
Document
D024 · official
Corpus
Exact headline quote verified against supplied corpus text.
Retrieved
2026-10-01T22:35Z
Snapshot
snap-eea786560def
Extracted by
cli:sonnet
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1947.12

Exact source text

Search Up^ << Previous Next >> cross-reference chaptered bills PDF | Add To My Favorites Search Phrase: Code Text Civil Code - CIV DIVISION 3. OBLIGATIONS [1427 - 3273.91] ( Heading of Division 3 amended by Stats. 1988, Ch. 160, Sec. 14. ) PART 4. OBLIGATIONS ARISING FROM PARTICULAR TRANSACTIONS [1738 - 3273.91] ( Part 4 enacted 1872. ) TITLE 5. HIRING [1925 - 1997.270] ( Title 5 enacted 1872. ) CHAPTER 2. Hiring of Real Property [1940 - 1954.071] ( Chapter 2 enacted 1872. ) 1947.12. (a) (1)   Subject to subdivision (b), an owner of residential real property shall not, over the course of any 12-month period, increase the gross rental rate for a dwelling or a unit more than 5 percent plus the percentage change in the cost of living, or 10 percent, whichever is lower, of the lowest gross rental rate charged for that dwelling or unit at any time during the 12 months prior to the effective date of the increase. In determining the lowest gross rental amount pursuant to this section, any rent discounts, incentives, concessions, or credits offered by the owner of such unit of residential real property and accepted by the tenant shall be excluded. The gross per-month rental rate and any owner-offered discounts, incentives, concessions, or credits shall be separately listed and identified in the lease or rental agreement or any amendments to an existing lease or rental agreement. (2) If the same tenant rem

Condition and exemption sources

  • Exemption: Deed-restricted or subsidized affordable housing

    “Housing restricted by deed, regulatory restriction contained in an agreement with a government agency, or other recorded document as affordable housing”

  • Exemption: School dormitories

    “Dormitories owned and operated by an institution of higher education”

  • Exemption: Certificate of occupancy within previous 15 years (not mobilehome)

    “Housing that has been issued a certificate of occupancy within the previous 15 years, unless the housing is a mobilehome.”

  • Exemption: Separately alienable property with non-corporate owner and notice

    “Residential real property that is alienable separate from the title to any other dwelling unit, including a mobilehome”

  • Exemption: Owner-occupied duplex

    “A property containing two separate dwelling units within a single structure in which the owner occupied one of the units as the owner’s principal place of residence”

Extraction review notes

  • unsupported predicate (evaluates unknown): Housing subject to local rent or price control that restricts annual increases to less than the state cap
  • unsupported predicate (evaluates unknown): Owner is not an LLC with a corporate member or mobilehome park management
  • unsupported predicate (evaluates unknown): Tenants were given the required written exemption notice
  • unsupported predicate (evaluates unknown): Landlord notified tenant in writing that tenancy is not subject to just cause and rent increase limits
  • exemption "Stricter local rent control" treated as precedence (yields to same-category local rule)
  • merged 2 extractions: D024, D040

Legal information, not legal advice. Machine-extracted; verify against the official source.

Show reasoning

Exemptions in the law: Deed-restricted or subsidized affordable housing; dormitories of higher education or K-12 schools; housing under stricter local rent control; housing with a certificate of occupancy issued within the previous 15 years (except mobilehomes); separately alienable property (e.g. single-family homes, condos) whose owner is not a REIT, corporation, LLC with a corporate member or mobilehome park management and where written notice was given; duplex where the owner occupies one unit as principal residence.

JurisdictiontrueLegal statusin_forceCoverageunknown

Exemption: Deed-restricted or subsidized affordable housing (all of) → false

  • falseHousing restricted as affordable or subsidizedFact: false (presumed) · SANDAG/SanGIS parcels · no subsidy/deed restriction recorded in assessor use code

Exemption: School dormitories (all of) → false

  • falseDormitory owned and operated by a higher-education institution or K-12 schoolFact: multifamily · SANDAG/SanGIS parcels · use code 14 SANDAG asr_landuse 14-16 (5+ units)

Exemption: Certificate of occupancy within previous 15 years (not mobilehome) (all of) → unknown

  • unknownCertificate of occupancy issued within the previous 15 yearsFact: not in data (no year built or certificate-of-occupancy date in data)
  • trueNot a mobilehomeFact: multifamily · SANDAG/SanGIS parcels · use code 14 SANDAG asr_landuse 14-16 (5+ units)

Exemption: Separately alienable property with non-corporate owner and notice (all of) → false

  • falseResidential property alienable separate from title to any other dwelling unitFact: multifamily · SANDAG/SanGIS parcels · use code 14 SANDAG asr_landuse 14-16 (5+ units)
  • unknownOwner is not a REIT or corporationFact: not in data (owner names deliberately excluded from sample)
  • unknownOwner is not an LLC with a corporate member or mobilehome park managementFact: not in data
  • unknownTenants were given the required written exemption noticeFact: not in data

Exemption: Owner-occupied duplex (all of) → false

  • falseProperty with two dwelling units in a single structureFact: multifamily · SANDAG/SanGIS parcels · use code 14 SANDAG asr_landuse 14-16 (5+ units)
  • unknownOwner occupies one unit as principal residenceFact: not in data (owner occupancy not in data)

Missing facts that cannot change this answer

  • Irrelevant here: exemption "Separately alienable property with non-corporate owner and notice" also requires "Residential property alienable separate from title to any other dwelling unit", which is false (multifamily · SANDAG/SanGIS parcels · use code 14 SANDAG asr_landuse 14-16 (5+ units)); a conjunction with a false part is false whatever "Owner is not a REIT or corporation" is.
  • Irrelevant here: exemption "Separately alienable property with non-corporate owner and notice" also requires "Residential property alienable separate from title to any other dwelling unit", which is false (multifamily · SANDAG/SanGIS parcels · use code 14 SANDAG asr_landuse 14-16 (5+ units)); a conjunction with a false part is false whatever "Owner is not an LLC with a corporate member or mobilehome park management" is.
  • Irrelevant here: exemption "Separately alienable property with non-corporate owner and notice" also requires "Residential property alienable separate from title to any other dwelling unit", which is false (multifamily · SANDAG/SanGIS parcels · use code 14 SANDAG asr_landuse 14-16 (5+ units)); a conjunction with a false part is false whatever "Tenants were given the required written exemption notice" is.
  • Irrelevant here: exemption "Owner-occupied duplex" also requires "Property with two dwelling units in a single structure", which is false (multifamily · SANDAG/SanGIS parcels · use code 14 SANDAG asr_landuse 14-16 (5+ units)); a conjunction with a false part is false whatever "Owner occupies one unit as principal residence" is.

Just-cause eviction

Depends on first certificate-of-occupancy date

California Tenant Protection Act – Just Cause Eviction

Cal. Civ. Code § 1946.2 · CA · low confidence

After you have lived in your home continuously and lawfully for 12 months, your landlord can end your tenancy only for a listed at-fault or no-fault just cause stated in the written notice. For no-fault terminations the landlord must pay one month's rent as relocation assistance within 15 days of the notice or waive the final month's rent.

Key value Just cause required after 12 months of occupancy; relocation assistance of 1 month's rent for no-fault termination

Statewide CA rule; in force (effective 2026-01-01). Coverage depends on facts not in the data: Tenant shares bathroom or kitchen with owner who lives on the property as principal residence; Owner-occupied; Owner occupied one unit as principal residence at start of tenancy and continues; Certificate of occupancy issued within the previous 15 years; Owner is not a REIT, corporation, or LLC with a corporate member; Tenants were given the required written exemption notice. Assumes affordable_restricted: false (presumed) · SANDAG/SanGIS parcels · no subsidy/deed restriction recorded in assessor use code; exemption "Shared facilities with owner" does not apply (not determinable from data).

Outcomes (5 admissible cases checked, exhaustive):

Superseded by local rulewhen (first certificate-of-occupancy date ≤ 2011-01-01)
Does not applywhen (first certificate-of-occupancy date ≥ 2011-01-02)

Next action: Get first certificate-of-occupancy date: City building-department certificate-of-occupancy record (LA: LADBS open data; or a verified record import).

Does not apply to property subject to a local just cause ordinance adopted on or before September 1, 2019, or a later local ordinance that is more protective (with a binding finding); the local ordinance applies instead. A property is not subject to both. Less protective local ordinances adopted after September 1, 2019 are not enforced. Amended by AB 1529 (Stats. 2025, ch. 203), effective January 1, 2026; section operative April 1, 2024 and repealed January 1, 2030.

Source evidence

California Tenant Protection Act – Just Cause Eviction

Citation
Cal. Civ. Code § 1946.2
Status
enacted
Effective
2026-01-01
Document
D023 · official
Corpus
Exact headline quote verified against supplied corpus text.
Retrieved
2026-10-01T22:35Z
Snapshot
snap-eea786560def
Extracted by
cli:sonnet
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1946.2

Exact source text

ch Text Search Up^ << Previous Next >> cross-reference chaptered bills PDF | Add To My Favorites Search Phrase: Code Text Civil Code - CIV DIVISION 3. OBLIGATIONS [1427 - 3273.91] ( Heading of Division 3 amended by Stats. 1988, Ch. 160, Sec. 14. ) PART 4. OBLIGATIONS ARISING FROM PARTICULAR TRANSACTIONS [1738 - 3273.91] ( Part 4 enacted 1872. ) TITLE 5. HIRING [1925 - 1997.270] ( Title 5 enacted 1872. ) CHAPTER 2. Hiring of Real Property [1940 - 1954.071] ( Chapter 2 enacted 1872. ) 1946.2. (a) Notwithstanding any other law, after a tenant has continuously and lawfully occupied a residential real property for 12 months, the owner of the residential real property shall not terminate a tenancy without just cause, which shall be stated in the written notice to terminate tenancy. If any additional adult tenants are added to the lease before an existing tenant has continuously and lawfully occupied the residential real property for 24 months, then this subdivision shall only apply if either of the following are satisfied: (1) All of the tenants have continuously and lawfully occupied the residential real property for 12 months or more. (2) One or more tenants have continuously and lawfully occupied the residential real property for 24 months or more. (b) For purposes of

Condition and exemption sources

  • Exemption: Transient and tourist hotel occupancy

    “Transient and tourist hotel occupancy as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 1940.”

  • Exemption: Nonprofit hospital, religious facility, extended care or residential care facility

    “Housing accommodations in a nonprofit hospital, religious facility, extended care facility, licensed residential care facility for the elderly”

  • Exemption: Institutional dormitories

    “Dormitories owned and operated by an institution of higher education”

  • Exemption: Shared facilities with owner

    “Housing accommodations in which the tenant shares bathroom or kitchen facilities with the owner who maintains their principal residence at the residential real property.”

  • Exemption: Single-family owner-occupied residence

    “Single-family owner-occupied residences, including both of the following:”

  • Exemption: Owner-occupied duplex

    “A property containing two separate dwelling units within a single structure in which the owner occupied one of the units as the owner’s principal place of residence at the beginning of the tenancy”

  • Exemption: Certificate of occupancy within previous 15 years

    “Housing that has been issued a certificate of occupancy within the previous 15 years, unless the housing is a mobilehome.”

  • Exemption: Separately alienable property with qualifying owner

    “Residential real property, including a mobilehome, that is alienable separate from the title to any other dwelling unit, provided that both of the following apply:”

  • Exemption: Deed-restricted or subsidized affordable housing

    “Housing restricted by deed, regulatory restriction contained in an agreement with a government agency, or other recorded document as affordable housing”

Extraction review notes

  • unsupported predicate (evaluates unknown): Tenant shares bathroom or kitchen with owner who lives on the property as principal residence
  • unsupported predicate (evaluates unknown): Residential property alienable separate from title to any other dwelling unit
  • unsupported predicate (evaluates unknown): Tenants were given the required written exemption notice
  • exemption "Shared facilities with owner" not determinable from data; presumed not to apply (disclosed)
  • untyped predicate "Residential property alienable separate from title to any other dwelling unit" typed as property_type in single_family|condominium (Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1946.2(e)(8), 1947.12(d)(5): separately alienable dwelling = single-family home or condominium unit)

Legal information, not legal advice. Machine-extracted; verify against the official source.

Show reasoning

Exemptions in the law: Transient hotels; nonprofit hospitals, religious facilities, care facilities; school dormitories; shared bathroom/kitchen with owner-occupant; owner-occupied single-family residences renting no more than two units or bedrooms; owner-occupied duplexes; housing with a certificate of occupancy within the previous 15 years (except mobilehomes); separately alienable property whose owner is not a REIT, corporation, or LLC with a corporate member and where the required exemption notice was given; deed-restricted or subsidized affordable housing.

JurisdictiontrueLegal statusin_forceCoverageunknown

Exemption: Transient and tourist hotel occupancy (all of) → false

  • falseTransient and tourist hotel occupancyFact: multifamily · SANDAG/SanGIS parcels · use code 14 SANDAG asr_landuse 14-16 (5+ units)

Exemption: Nonprofit hospital, religious facility, extended care or residential care facility (all of) → false

  • falseHousing in nonprofit hospital, religious facility, extended care or care facilityFact: multifamily · SANDAG/SanGIS parcels · use code 14 SANDAG asr_landuse 14-16 (5+ units)

Exemption: Institutional dormitories (all of) → false

  • falseDormitory owned and operated by higher education institution or K-12 schoolFact: multifamily · SANDAG/SanGIS parcels · use code 14 SANDAG asr_landuse 14-16 (5+ units)

Exemption: Shared facilities with owner (all of) → false

  • unknownTenant shares bathroom or kitchen with owner who lives on the property as principal residenceFact: not in data

Exemption: Single-family owner-occupied residence (all of) → false

  • falseSingle-family residenceFact: multifamily · SANDAG/SanGIS parcels · use code 14 SANDAG asr_landuse 14-16 (5+ units)
  • unknownOwner-occupiedFact: not in data (owner occupancy not in data)

Exemption: Owner-occupied duplex (all of) → false

  • falseTwo dwelling units within a single structureFact: multifamily · SANDAG/SanGIS parcels · use code 14 SANDAG asr_landuse 14-16 (5+ units)
  • unknownOwner occupied one unit as principal residence at start of tenancy and continuesFact: not in data (owner occupancy not in data)

Exemption: Certificate of occupancy within previous 15 years (all of) → unknown

  • unknownCertificate of occupancy issued within the previous 15 yearsFact: not in data (no year built or certificate-of-occupancy date in data)
  • trueExemption does not apply to mobilehomesFact: multifamily · SANDAG/SanGIS parcels · use code 14 SANDAG asr_landuse 14-16 (5+ units)

Exemption: Separately alienable property with qualifying owner (all of) → false

  • falseResidential property alienable separate from title to any other dwelling unitFact: multifamily · SANDAG/SanGIS parcels · use code 14 SANDAG asr_landuse 14-16 (5+ units)
  • unknownOwner is not a REIT, corporation, or LLC with a corporate memberFact: not in data (owner names deliberately excluded from sample)
  • unknownTenants were given the required written exemption noticeFact: not in data

Exemption: Deed-restricted or subsidized affordable housing (all of) → false

  • falseRestricted affordable or subsidized housingFact: false (presumed) · SANDAG/SanGIS parcels · no subsidy/deed restriction recorded in assessor use code

Missing facts that cannot change this answer

  • Irrelevant here: exemption "Single-family owner-occupied residence" also requires "Single-family residence", which is false (multifamily · SANDAG/SanGIS parcels · use code 14 SANDAG asr_landuse 14-16 (5+ units)); a conjunction with a false part is false whatever "Owner-occupied" is.
  • Irrelevant here: exemption "Owner-occupied duplex" also requires "Two dwelling units within a single structure", which is false (multifamily · SANDAG/SanGIS parcels · use code 14 SANDAG asr_landuse 14-16 (5+ units)); a conjunction with a false part is false whatever "Owner occupied one unit as principal residence at start of tenancy and continues" is.
  • Irrelevant here: exemption "Separately alienable property with qualifying owner" also requires "Residential property alienable separate from title to any other dwelling unit", which is false (multifamily · SANDAG/SanGIS parcels · use code 14 SANDAG asr_landuse 14-16 (5+ units)); a conjunction with a false part is false whatever "Owner is not a REIT, corporation, or LLC with a corporate member" is.
  • Irrelevant here: exemption "Separately alienable property with qualifying owner" also requires "Residential property alienable separate from title to any other dwelling unit", which is false (multifamily · SANDAG/SanGIS parcels · use code 14 SANDAG asr_landuse 14-16 (5+ units)); a conjunction with a false part is false whatever "Tenants were given the required written exemption notice" is.
Depends on first certificate-of-occupancy date

San Diego Residential Tenant Protections – Just Cause for Termination of Tenancy

San Diego Municipal Code §§ 98.0701–98.0710 · San Diego, CA · low confidence

A landlord may not terminate a tenancy without just cause (at-fault or no-fault). For no-fault terminations the landlord must give notice, pay relocation assistance of two months' rent (three months if tenant is a senior or disabled) or waive that rent, and offer the unit back in certain cases.

Key value Just cause required; relocation assistance 2 months' rent (3 months for seniors/disabled)

San Diego, CA city rule; in force (effective 2023-06-24). Coverage depends on facts not in the data: Certificate of occupancy issued within the previous 15 years; Landlord's principal residence; Landlord occupies one unit as principal residence; Landlord is not a REIT or corporation (or LLC with a corporate member); Tenants given required written exemption notice. Assumes affordable_restricted: false (presumed) · SANDAG/SanGIS parcels · no subsidy/deed restriction recorded in assessor use code.

Outcomes (5 admissible cases checked, exhaustive):

Applieswhen (first certificate-of-occupancy date ≤ 2011-01-02)
Does not applywhen (first certificate-of-occupancy date ≥ 2011-01-03)

Next action: Get first certificate-of-occupancy date: City building-department certificate-of-occupancy record (LA: LADBS open data; or a verified record import).

Implements and is consistent with Cal. Civ. Code § 1946.2; rights are in addition to state and federal rights. Relocation assistance is credited against other required relocation assistance. Effective 2023-06-24 per ordinance O-21647; amended effective 2024-03-28.

Source evidence

San Diego Residential Tenant Protections – Just Cause for Termination of Tenancy

Citation
San Diego Municipal Code §§ 98.0701–98.0710
Status
enacted
Effective
2023-06-24
Document
D073 · official
Corpus
Exact headline quote verified against supplied corpus text.
Retrieved
2026-10-01T22:37Z
Snapshot
snap-eea786560def
Extracted by
cli:sonnet
https://docs.sandiego.gov/municode/municodechapter09/ch09art08division07.pdf

Exact source text

which at least one member is a corporation; or (4) management of a mobilehome park, as defined in California Civil Code section 798.2. For a tenancy existing before January 1, 2024, the notice required above may be provided in the lease. For a tenancy commenced or renewed on or after January 1, 2024, the notice required above shall be provided in the lease. (“Exemptions” added 5-25-2023 by O-21647 N.S.; effective 6-24-2023.) §98.0704 Just Cause Required for Termination of Tenancy A landlord shall not terminate a tenancy without just cause. For purposes of this Division, just cause includes at-fault just cause and no-fault just cause. (a) At-Fault Just Cause. At-fault just cause is any of the following: (1) a default in the payment of rent; (2) a breach of a material term of the lease, as described in California Code of Civil Procedure section 1161(3), as may be amended, including violation of a provision of the lease after being issued a written notice to correct the violation; Ch. Art. Div. 9 8 7 6 San Diego Municipal Code Chapter 9: Building, Housing and Sign Regulations (3-2024) (3) the maintaining

Condition and exemption sources

  • Exemption: Housing with certificate of occupancy within previous 15 years

    “housing that has been issued a certificate of occupancy within the previous 15 years, unless the housing is a mobilehome”

  • Exemption: Deed- or regulatory-restricted affordable housing or subsidized affordable housing

    “housing restricted by deed, regulatory restriction contained in an agreement with a government agency, or other document as affordable housing”

  • Exemption: Mobilehomes subject to Mobilehome Residency Law

    “mobilehomes subject to the Mobilehome Residency Law (California Civil Code sections 798-799.11)”

  • Exemption: Hotels (transient and tourist occupancy)

    “transient and tourist hotel occupancy as defined in California Civil Code section 1940(b)”

  • Exemption: Dormitories of educational institutions

    “dormitories owned and operated by an institution of higher education or an institution offering instruction to any grade from kindergarten through 12”

  • Exemption: Owner-occupied single-family residence

    “single-family residence occupied by the landlord as the landlord’s principal place of residence”

  • Exemption: Owner-occupied duplex

    “a property containing two separate dwelling units within a single structure in which the landlord occupies one of the dwelling units as the landlord’s principal place of residence”

  • Exemption: Separately alienable property with non-corporate landlord and exemption notice

    “residential rental property, including a mobilehome, that is alienable separate from the title to any other dwelling unit”

Extraction review notes

  • unsupported predicate (evaluates unknown): Property alienable separate from any other dwelling unit
  • unsupported predicate (evaluates unknown): Tenants given required written exemption notice
  • untyped predicate "Property alienable separate from any other dwelling unit" typed as property_type in single_family|condominium (Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1946.2(e)(8), 1947.12(d)(5): separately alienable dwelling = single-family home or condominium unit)

Legal information, not legal advice. Machine-extracted; verify against the official source.

Show reasoning

Exemptions in the law: Transient/tourist hotels; short-term occupancy; deed-restricted or subsidized affordable housing (not Section 8); mobilehomes under the Mobilehome Residency Law; nonprofit hospital, religious facility, care facilities, nonprofit transitional housing; dormitories; shared kitchen/bath with resident landlord; owner-occupied single-family residence (up to two bedrooms/ADUs rented); duplex with owner-occupant; housing with certificate of occupancy within previous 15 years; separately alienable property whose landlord is not a REIT, corporation, LLC with a corporate member or mobilehome park management, with written notice of exemption.

JurisdictiontrueLegal statusin_forceCoverageunknown

Exemption: Housing with certificate of occupancy within previous 15 years (all of) → unknown

  • unknownCertificate of occupancy issued within the previous 15 yearsFact: not in data (no year built or certificate-of-occupancy date in data)
  • trueExemption does not apply to mobilehomesFact: multifamily · SANDAG/SanGIS parcels · use code 14 SANDAG asr_landuse 14-16 (5+ units)

Exemption: Deed- or regulatory-restricted affordable housing or subsidized affordable housing (all of) → false

  • falseRestricted or subsidized affordable housing (not Section 8)Fact: false (presumed) · SANDAG/SanGIS parcels · no subsidy/deed restriction recorded in assessor use code

Exemption: Mobilehomes subject to Mobilehome Residency Law (all of) → false

  • falseMobilehome subject to the Mobilehome Residency LawFact: multifamily · SANDAG/SanGIS parcels · use code 14 SANDAG asr_landuse 14-16 (5+ units)

Exemption: Hotels (transient and tourist occupancy) (all of) → false

  • falseTransient and tourist hotel occupancyFact: multifamily · SANDAG/SanGIS parcels · use code 14 SANDAG asr_landuse 14-16 (5+ units)

Exemption: Dormitories of educational institutions (all of) → false

  • falseDormitory owned and operated by an educational institutionFact: multifamily · SANDAG/SanGIS parcels · use code 14 SANDAG asr_landuse 14-16 (5+ units)

Exemption: Owner-occupied single-family residence (all of) → false

  • falseSingle-family residenceFact: multifamily · SANDAG/SanGIS parcels · use code 14 SANDAG asr_landuse 14-16 (5+ units)
  • unknownLandlord's principal residenceFact: not in data (owner occupancy not in data)

Exemption: Owner-occupied duplex (all of) → false

  • falseTwo dwelling units in a single structureFact: multifamily · SANDAG/SanGIS parcels · use code 14 SANDAG asr_landuse 14-16 (5+ units)
  • unknownLandlord occupies one unit as principal residenceFact: not in data (owner occupancy not in data)

Exemption: Separately alienable property with non-corporate landlord and exemption notice (all of) → false

  • falseProperty alienable separate from any other dwelling unitFact: multifamily · SANDAG/SanGIS parcels · use code 14 SANDAG asr_landuse 14-16 (5+ units)
  • unknownLandlord is not a REIT or corporation (or LLC with a corporate member)Fact: not in data (owner names deliberately excluded from sample)
  • unknownTenants given required written exemption noticeFact: not in data

Missing facts that cannot change this answer

  • Irrelevant here: exemption "Owner-occupied single-family residence" also requires "Single-family residence", which is false (multifamily · SANDAG/SanGIS parcels · use code 14 SANDAG asr_landuse 14-16 (5+ units)); a conjunction with a false part is false whatever "Landlord's principal residence" is.
  • Irrelevant here: exemption "Owner-occupied duplex" also requires "Two dwelling units in a single structure", which is false (multifamily · SANDAG/SanGIS parcels · use code 14 SANDAG asr_landuse 14-16 (5+ units)); a conjunction with a false part is false whatever "Landlord occupies one unit as principal residence" is.
  • Irrelevant here: exemption "Separately alienable property with non-corporate landlord and exemption notice" also requires "Property alienable separate from any other dwelling unit", which is false (multifamily · SANDAG/SanGIS parcels · use code 14 SANDAG asr_landuse 14-16 (5+ units)); a conjunction with a false part is false whatever "Landlord is not a REIT or corporation (or LLC with a corporate member)" is.
  • Irrelevant here: exemption "Separately alienable property with non-corporate landlord and exemption notice" also requires "Property alienable separate from any other dwelling unit", which is false (multifamily · SANDAG/SanGIS parcels · use code 14 SANDAG asr_landuse 14-16 (5+ units)); a conjunction with a false part is false whatever "Tenants given required written exemption notice" is.

Security deposits

Applies

California residential security deposit cap

Cal. Civ. Code § 1950.5 · CA · high confidence

A landlord cannot demand or receive security (deposit, fee or charge) above one month's rent, in addition to first month's rent. Small landlords (natural persons or all-natural-person LLCs owning no more than two properties with four units total) may charge up to two months' rent, but not to service members.

Key value 1 month's rent maximum (2 months for small landlords)

Statewide CA rule; in force (effective 2024-07-01). Coverage conditions are met on the supplied facts.

Document shows the section as last amended by Stats. 2025, ch. 340 (AB 414), effective January 1, 2026; the July 1, 2024 date comes from subdivision (c)(6). No local-law interaction is stated.

Source evidence

California residential security deposit cap

Citation
Cal. Civ. Code § 1950.5
Status
enacted
Effective
2024-07-01
Document
D025 · official
Corpus
Exact headline quote verified against supplied corpus text.
Retrieved
2026-10-01T22:35Z
Snapshot
snap-eea786560def
Extracted by
cli:sonnet
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1950.5

Exact source text

t was in at the inception of the tenancy. The amendments to this paragraph enacted by the act adding this sentence shall apply only to tenancies for which the tenant’s right to occupy begins after January 1, 2003. (4) To remedy future defaults by the tenant in any obligation under the rental agreement to restore, replace, or return personal property or appurtenances, exclusive of ordinary wear and tear, if the security deposit is authorized to be applied thereto by the rental agreement. (c) (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), (3), or (5), a landlord shall not demand or receive security, however denominated, in an amount or value in excess of an amount equal to one month’s rent, in addition to any rent for the first month paid on or before initial occupancy. (2) This subdivision does not prohibit an advance payment of not less than six months’ rent if the term of the lease is six months or longer. (3) This subdivision does not preclude a landlord and a tenant from entering into a mutual agreement for the landlord, at the request of the tenant and for a specified fee or charge, to make structural, decorative, furnishing, or other similar alterations, if the alterations are other than cleaning or repairing for which the landlord may charge the previo

Extraction review notes

  • merged 2 extractions: D007, D025

Legal information, not legal advice. Machine-extracted; verify against the official source.

Show reasoning

Exemptions in the law: Advance payment of six months' rent or more allowed if lease term is six months or longer; mutual agreement for tenant-requested alterations for a specified fee. Small-landlord two-month cap does not apply if the prospective tenant is a service member.

JurisdictiontrueLegal statusin_forceCoveragetrue

No property-level conditions extracted: the rule covers all residential rentals in its jurisdiction.

Application & screening fees

Applies

California application screening fee cap

Cal. Civ. Code § 1950.6 · CA · high confidence

A landlord may charge an application screening fee of no more than $30 per applicant (adjusted for CPI since 1998), and never more than actual out-of-pocket costs and time spent. No fee may be charged if no unit is available or will be soon, and the landlord must give an itemized receipt and follow first-come screening or refund rules.

Key value $30 per applicant, CPI-adjusted since January 1, 1998

Statewide CA rule; in force (effective 2026-01-01). Coverage conditions are met on the supplied facts.

Section 1950.6 applies notwithstanding Civ. Code § 1950.5; the fee is not treated as security or an advance fee. It does not preempt rules on deposits and fees under federal or state housing assistance programs. Effective date is that of the AB 1170 (2025) amendment.

Source evidence

California application screening fee cap

Citation
Cal. Civ. Code § 1950.6
Status
enacted
Effective
2026-01-01
Document
D026 · official
Corpus
Exact headline quote verified against supplied corpus text.
Retrieved
2026-10-01T22:35Z
Snapshot
snap-eea786560def
Extracted by
cli:sonnet
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1950.6

Exact source text

their agent may, but is not required to, accept and rely upon a consumer credit report presented by an applicant. (b) The amount of the application screening fee shall not be greater than the actual out-of-pocket costs of gathering information concerning the applicant, including, but not limited to, the cost of using a tenant screening service or a consumer credit reporting service, and the reasonable value of time spent by the landlord or their agent in obtaining information on the applicant. In no case shall the amount of the application screening fee charged by the landlord or their agent be greater than thirty dollars ($30) per applicant. The thirty dollar ($30) application screening fee may be adjusted annually by the landlord or their agent commensurate with an increase in the Consumer Price Index, beginning on January 1, 1998. (c) (1) A landlord or their agent shall not charge an applicant an application screening fee when they know or should have known that no rental unit is available at that time or will be available within a reasonable period of time. (2) A landlord or their agent may charge an applicant an application scr

Extraction review notes

  • merged 2 extractions: D005, D026

Legal information, not legal advice. Machine-extracted; verify against the official source.

Show reasoning
JurisdictiontrueLegal statusin_forceCoveragetrue

No property-level conditions extracted: the rule covers all residential rentals in its jurisdiction.

Screening restrictions

Applies

California FEHA source-of-income protections in housing (Gov. Code § 12955)

Cal. Gov. Code § 12955 · CA · high confidence

Landlords may not discriminate against applicants or tenants because of their source of income, including Section 8 vouchers and other government subsidies. Where a government rent subsidy applies, income standards must be based on the portion of rent the tenant pays, and applicants with credit history screening must be allowed to offer alternative evidence of ability to pay. Landlords may still ask about the level or source of income.

Key value ban on source-of-income discrimination (incl. housing vouchers)

Statewide CA rule; in force (effective 2024-01-01). Coverage conditions are met on the supplied facts.

Source-of-income language in its current form was amended by SB 267 (Stats. 2023, ch. 776), effective January 1, 2024. The document says nothing about local ordinances.

Source evidence

California FEHA source-of-income protections in housing (Gov. Code § 12955)

Citation
Cal. Gov. Code § 12955
Status
enacted
Effective
2024-01-01
Document
D027 · official
Corpus
Exact headline quote verified against supplied corpus text.
Retrieved
2026-10-01T22:35Z
Snapshot
snap-eea786560def
Extracted by
cli:sonnet
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=GOV&sectionNum=12955

Exact source text

A [8000 - 22980] ( Title 2 enacted by Stats. 1943, Ch. 134. ) DIVISION 3. EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT [11000 - 15990.3] ( Division 3 added by Stats. 1945, Ch. 111. ) PART 2.8. CIVIL RIGHTS DEPARTMENT [12900 - 12999] ( Heading of Part 2.8 amended by Stats. 2022, Ch. 48, Sec. 29. ) CHAPTER 6. Discrimination Prohibited [12940 - 12957] ( Chapter 6 added by Stats. 1980, Ch. 992. ) ARTICLE 2. Housing Discrimination [12955 - 12957] ( Article 2 added by Stats. 1980, Ch. 992. ) 12955. It shall be unlawful: (a) For the owner of any housing accommodation to discriminate against or harass any person because of the race, color, religion, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry, familial status, source of income, disability, veteran or military status, or genetic information of that person. (b) For the owner of any housing accommodation to make or to cause to be made any written or oral inquiry concerning the race, color, religion, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry, familial status, disability, veteran or military status, or genetic information of any person seeking to purchase, rent, or lease any housing accommodation. (c) For any person to make, print, or publish, or cause to be made, printed, or publis

Condition and exemption sources

  • Exemption: Owner-occupied home renting to one additional person

    “When an owner is occupying a home and is renting to one additional person, the owner may exclude applicants based on protected characteristics.”

Extraction review notes

  • unsupported predicate (evaluates unknown): Owner rents to only one additional person
  • coverage conditions taken from D016; quote from D027
  • untyped predicate "Owner rents to only one additional person" typed as property_type eq single_family (roomer exemption: renting part of a single-family home to one person)
  • merged 2 extractions: D016, D027

Legal information, not legal advice. Machine-extracted; verify against the official source.

Show reasoning
JurisdictiontrueLegal statusin_forceCoveragetrue

Exemption: Owner-occupied home renting to one additional person (all of) → false

  • unknownOwner occupies the homeFact: not in data (owner occupancy not in data)
  • falseOwner rents to only one additional personFact: multifamily · SANDAG/SanGIS parcels · use code 14 SANDAG asr_landuse 14-16 (5+ units)

Missing facts that cannot change this answer

  • Irrelevant here: exemption "Owner-occupied home renting to one additional person" also requires "Owner rents to only one additional person", which is false (multifamily · SANDAG/SanGIS parcels · use code 14 SANDAG asr_landuse 14-16 (5+ units)); a conjunction with a false part is false whatever "Owner occupies the home" is.

Algorithmic rent-setting

Applies

California AB 325 – Common pricing algorithm prohibition (Cartwright Act)

Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16729 (added by Stats. 2025, ch. 338, A.B. 325) · CA · high confidence

It is unlawful to use or distribute a common pricing algorithm as part of a contract, combination or conspiracy to restrain trade, or to coerce another person to adopt prices or commercial terms recommended by such an algorithm. A common pricing algorithm is software or other methodology used by two or more persons that uses competitor data to recommend or influence a price.

Key value ban on use or distribution of common pricing algorithms in restraint of trade or with coercion

Statewide CA rule; in force (effective 2026-01-01). Coverage conditions are met on the supplied facts.

Chaptered October 6, 2025 with no urgency clause shown, so effective January 1, 2026 under Cal. Const. art. IV, § 8(c). Section 16729(c) preserves other antitrust laws. The document does not address local ordinances.

Source evidence

California AB 325 – Common pricing algorithm prohibition (Cartwright Act)

Citation
Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16729 (added by Stats. 2025, ch. 338, A.B. 325)
Status
enacted
Effective
2026-01-01
Document
D022 · official
Corpus
Exact headline quote verified against supplied corpus text.
Retrieved
2026-10-01T22:35Z
Snapshot
snap-eea786560def
Extracted by
cli:sonnet
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB325

Exact source text

reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: YES Bill Text The people of the State of California do enact as follows: SECTION 1. Section 16729 is added to the Business and Professions Code, to read: 16729. (a) It shall be unlawful for a person to use or distribute a common pricing algorithm as part of a contract, combination in the form of a trust, or conspiracy to restrain trade or commerce in violation of this chapter. (b) It shall be unlawful for a person to use or distribute a common pricing algorithm if the person coerces another person to set or adopt a recommended price or commercial term recommended by the common pricing algorithm for the same or similar products or services in the jurisdiction of this state. (c) Nothing in this section shall impair or limit the applicability of antitrust laws. (d) For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply: (1) “Antitrust laws” means the provisions o

Legal information, not legal advice. Machine-extracted; verify against the official source.

Show reasoning
JurisdictiontrueLegal statusin_forceCoveragetrue

No property-level conditions extracted: the rule covers all residential rentals in its jurisdiction.

Applies

Prohibition of Anti-Competitive Automated Rent Price-Fixing Ordinance

S.D. Mun. Code §§ 98.1101–98.1104 (proposed Div. 11, Ch. 9, Art. 8; O-2025-107) · San Diego, CA · high confidence

Landlords may not use algorithmic software that relies on nonpublic competitor data to set rents or occupancy levels, and no one may sell or license such software to a landlord. Tenants can sue for injunctive relief, damages or civil penalties.

Key value ban on sale, licensing and use of algorithmic rent-setting devices

San Diego, CA city rule; in force (effective 2025-06-21). Coverage conditions are met on the supplied facts.

Document shows only the proposed ordinance with blank passage and adoption dates, so it is pending. If adopted, it would take effect on the thirtieth day after final passage.

Source evidence

Prohibition of Anti-Competitive Automated Rent Price-Fixing Ordinance

Citation
S.D. Mun. Code §§ 98.1101–98.1104 (proposed Div. 11, Ch. 9, Art. 8; O-2025-107)
Status
enacted
Effective
2025-06-21
Document
D076 · official
Corpus
Exact headline quote verified against supplied corpus text.
Retrieved
2026-10-01T22:37Z
Snapshot
snap-eea786560def
Extracted by
cli:sonnet
https://sandiego.gov/sites/default/files/2025-04/automated-rent-price-fixing-prohibition-ordinance-materials.pdf

Exact source text

ase start and end dates. Person has the same meaning as in San Diego Municipal Code section 11.0210, as may be amended. Residential rental property has the same meaning as in San Diego Municipal Code section 98.0702, as may be amended. Tenant has the same meaning as in San Diego Municipal Code section 98.0702, as may be amended. §98.1103 Use and Sale of Algorithmic Devices Prohibited (a) It is unlawful for a person to sell, license, or otherwise provide an algorithmic device to a landlord. (b) It is unlawful for a landlord to use an algorithmic device to set rental rates or occupancy levels for residential rental property. For each month a violation of section 98.1103(b) exists or continues, and for each residential rental property a landlord uses an algorithmic device, it shall constitute a separate and distinct violation. (O-2025-107) -PAGE 5 OF 6- §98.1104 Remedies ( a ) A tenant may seek injunctive relief, damages, or civil penalties of up to $1,000 per violation of this Division, in a civil action against a landlord. In an action brought under this Division, a prevailing tenant shall recover costs and reaso

Extraction review notes

  • legal version from evidence ev-73568a1149 (https://docs.sandiego.gov/municode/MuniCodeChapter09/Ch09Art08Division11.pdf), ev-a0ae61fee8 (https://docs.sandiego.gov/municode/MuniCodeChapter09/Ch09Art08Division11.pdf): status enacted, effective 2025-06-21

Legal information, not legal advice. Machine-extracted; verify against the official source.

Show reasoning

Exemptions in the law: Does not cover software used to publish reports from aggregated historical nonpublic data more than 90 days old or from public information that does not recommend rents for future leases; or software used to set rents or income limits under affordable housing program guidelines.

JurisdictiontrueLegal statusin_forceCoveragetrue

No property-level conditions extracted: the rule covers all residential rentals in its jurisdiction.

Audit view source, retrieval date, as-of date and reasoning boundary per answer
Audit trail for each answer
RuleResultSourceRetrievedAs ofReasoning boundaryConfidence
r-2fcd4bCal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16729 (added by Stats. 2025, ch. 338, A.B. 325)appliesD0222026-10-012026-01-02decided by supplied factshigh
r-98c475Cal. Civ. Code § 1950.6appliesD0262026-10-012026-01-02decided by supplied factshigh
r-b3a720Cal. Civ. Code § 1946.2unknownD0232026-10-012026-01-02open: depends on first certificate-of-occupancy datepresumes: affordable_restricted: false (presumed) · SANDAG/SanGIS parcels · no subsidy/deed restriction recorded in assessor use code; exemption "Shared facilities with owner" does not apply (not determinable from data)low
r-f6181cCal. Civ. Code § 1947.12unknownD0242026-10-012026-01-02open: depends on first certificate-of-occupancy datepresumes: affordable_restricted: false (presumed) · SANDAG/SanGIS parcels · no subsidy/deed restriction recorded in assessor use codelow
r-90b45cCal. Gov. Code § 12955appliesD0272026-10-012026-01-02decided by supplied factshigh
r-29e94dCal. Civ. Code § 1950.5appliesD0252026-10-012026-01-02decided by supplied factshigh
r-a41e33S.D. Mun. Code §§ 98.1101–98.1104 (proposed Div. 11, Ch. 9, Art. 8; O-2025-107)appliesD0762026-10-012026-01-02decided by supplied factshigh
r-18e131San Diego Municipal Code §§ 98.0701–98.0710unknownD0732026-10-012026-01-02open: depends on first certificate-of-occupancy datepresumes: affordable_restricted: false (presumed) · SANDAG/SanGIS parcels · no subsidy/deed restriction recorded in assessor use codelow

Download audit trail (JSON) · snapshot snap-eea786560def · official facts only

Legal information, not legal advice. Covers the supplied corpus only (3 states, 10 cities, 6 rule categories); absence of a rule here is not proof that none exists. Results as of 2026-01-02. Snapshot snap-eea786560def.